Donations are essential to keep Write Out Loud going    

THE BATTLE OF STAMFORD BRIDGE

entry picture

.(The 950th year anniversary.  A sad tale of end-of-season fixture congestion)

 

You’ve heard of the Battle of Hastings

Took place in 1066,

When ‘Arold the Brave of England

Fell for some Froggy’s cruel tricks

 

I refer to Norman the Conker

(Who’d conkered nowt up till then)

But pretended to run from the battle

Then turned and skewered our men.

 

Then Norman let fly with an arrow

With venom its target to find

In consequence ‘Arold the Brave

Soon became ‘Arold the Blind.

 

But what is by far less well known

Is before ‘e got into this fix

‘Arold had just won one battle

Already in 1066.

 

But these two both ‘ad a rival

As it ‘appens, called ‘Arald by name –

‘Arald ‘Adrada the Viking

Aka – the Dastardly Dane

 

(‘e were Norwegian as it ‘appens, but it didn’t rhyme).

 

This ‘Arald had formed an A-lli-ance

i.e. worked in cahoots with another

Who reckoned to call ‘issen Tostig.

An’ ‘e were our ‘Arold’s brother!

 

Said the Dane one day to this Tostig

“I’ve a caper that’s bound to work

Let’s invade t’North of England together

I fancy some shopping in York.”

 

They set sail for England together

To pillage to rape and to plunder

Riding the storms of the North Sea

 - Then pootling up the ‘Umber.

 

Until they came upon Fulford

Said ‘Arald “Put in to land.

I’m wanting to paddle about in t’Ouse

And build some castles of sand”.

 

‘t were then that York’s brave defenders

Gave battle to ‘Adrada’s men

But t’Viking 11 played 4-4-2

And York could only field 10.

 

We tried to use our off-side trap

But t’Vikings won easy, of course;

”This city’ll now be called Jorvik”

Says ‘Arald “That’s York in Norse”.

 

They plundered and wassailed rudely

Some ate a salmon sandwich

Then sunbathed and licked at their ice creams

By t’Derwent at yon Stamford Bridge.

 

Just then there appeared t’Saxon army

‘Arold Godwinson rode in command

Who sat there proud and magnificent-like

On ‘is ‘orse with ‘is ‘awk in ‘is ‘and.

 

The Vikings was all caught a-napping

By t’Saxons war-like screams

Some ‘ad to fight in their Speedos

Some had to chuck their ice-creams.

 

Now ‘Adrada’s men was divided

On both sides of the river

            ‘Arald asked “Should we surrender?”

But Tostig answered “Nivver!”

 

So ‘e tried to withdraw ‘is army

Across the rickety bridge

They trailed across till the very last man

An’ ‘e was as big as a fridge.

 

He stopped an’ ‘e turned on the structure

And wielding ‘is long ‘andled axe

‘E challenged us Saxons to combat

 - ‘E’d been drinking that Pepsi Max!

 

‘E chopped ‘em down in ‘uggins

Us Saxons dropped like flies

It ‘eld us up from us supper

 - Meat an ’tatie pies.

 

But ‘Arold was clever and cunningningning

The devious so-and-so

‘E paddled beneath in a barrel

Then brogged t’Dane from below

 

t’Dane’s deeds are told in Norsemen’s halls

To make the children shiver

Of ‘ow  ‘e entered Valhalla

After entering the river.

 

But once we was over the Derwent

We started to ‘ack and to ‘ew

And one by one they started to fall

Then latterly two by two.

 

The battle raged forthwards and fifthwards

‘Adrada he made a strong stand

But when it was done, there sat our boy

On ‘is ‘orse with ‘is ‘awk in ‘is ‘and.

 

Us Saxons had won on penalties

It wa’ close – it were never a rout.

But us Saxons are really Germans, see.

So penalties? – never in doubt!

 

So Vikings sailed back in ‘igh dudgeon

(It’s a bit like an old Blackpool tram)

Shouts ‘Arold, “Keep out of England,

Or else come back wi’thi mam”.

 

They sailed toward Scan Di Navya

The Danes to brew lager beer

Norwegians went on to invent t’South Pole

And t’Swedes to shop at Ikea.

 

But never again would t’Vikings return

We called ‘Adrada a plonker

Forever would t’Saxons rule Eng-er-land

 - Well, till we met Norman the Conker.

🌷(1)

◄ HURRI-KANE

BORIS THE BIDER ►

Comments

Profile image

John Coopey

Tue 23rd Feb 2016 20:58

...which kind of implies that "Englishness" is a function of our invaders.
I suspect that very few of us would have pure "English" DNA tracing back to those early times. In fact I recollect a TV programme a couple of years ago when a prominent EDL figure agreed to have his DNA analysed and was mortified to find that he was a right Mongol of DNA strains.

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Tue 23rd Feb 2016 15:46

It could be said that "English" is ethnically based on the
"back in the mists of time" scenario when Celts, Danes,
Saxons and those Normans had their day forming
what came later. Invasion is too strong a word for the
sanctuary allowed to various factions escaping hard
times in their own lands. It is reported that Queen
Elizabeth 1 actually acted to limit the inflow to ensure
the social stability of her realm in her own time. Later
arrivals were of limited numbers that were willing to
assimilate (like those Russians who fled to America and
"Anglicised" their names...Irving Berlin for Izzy Baline
comes to mind). This small country's generosity taking
in others has led to the irony of it being lectured on
its "obligation" to do it. Good Queen Bess might have
had something to say about that presumption.

Profile image

John Coopey

Mon 22nd Feb 2016 22:04


just reading Winder's excellent book "Bloody Foreigners". He asks a very good question, "Since we have been 'invaded' so often (Celts, Romano/Iberians, Saxons, Danes, Normans, Huguenots, Jews, French, Italians, West Indians, etc etc, are we English the invaded or the invaders?"

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Mon 22nd Feb 2016 17:43

JC - perhaps the English should have been like the Irish -
with periodic attempts to rid themselves of the invaders
until finally succeeding centuries later.
But then it can be argued that victory was through successful assimilation that saw this country become one
of the great powers, with influence far in excess of its
modest size.

Profile image

John Coopey

Mon 22nd Feb 2016 09:33

I don't mind them coming after our jobs, Ken. They show more gumption than our home-grown numpties.

Profile image

ken eaton-dykes

Mon 22nd Feb 2016 00:37

At least they don't do any blood letting these days when they come here after our jobs. That's progress I suppose.

Profile image

John Coopey

Sun 21st Feb 2016 20:30

Yes, MC. I suspect that English trait of disrespect to our rulers was seriously reinforced by having the Normans high jacking the aristocracy for themselves.

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Sun 21st Feb 2016 17:38

JC - I've a feeling that the famous Brit. sense of humour
predates the arrival of the Normans.
When I think of poor Ethelred "The Unready" - and Alfred
and his burning cakes, I grin. Heaven help the soul who
made fun of the Normans and their descendants...all too
ready to take offence. I seem to recall the report of
the unhappy end to the wit who put about the
following jibe at Lords Ratcliffe, Catesby and Lovell, busy
doing their fawning best for Richard the Third.
"The Rat, the Cat and Lovell our dog
Rule all England under the Hog".
You can hear some the modern variety at most football
matches and some public meetings!

Profile image

John Coopey

Sat 20th Feb 2016 16:37

The Normans did indeed have Viking ancestry. The word derives from "Northmen". The Norman invasion was, in my view, the most formative influence on the identity of "Britishness", shaping class, language and history more than any other single event since the arrival of the Saxons.

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Sat 20th Feb 2016 14:32

An extraordinary combination of inspired entertainment and
historical information that the author of "1066 and All That"
would have loved!
I recall that Duke William also had Viking origins. The
home side were beaten by an opportunistic attack from
a cold war team and its supporters.

Profile image

John Coopey

Wed 17th Feb 2016 22:50

Thanks, Harry. I have to confess it's an old post; in fact the first thing I ever wrote (No 1 in my Greatest Hits Album!). It owes everything, of course, to Marriot Edgar - the italicised lines are a lift from his.
I'm indebted to Greg Freeman for the introductory line about "fixture congestion".
For a loada nonsense it does, surprisingly, have some historical accuracy!

Profile image

Harry O'Neill

Wed 17th Feb 2016 22:17

John,
twenty six stanzas of sheer comical dialectic genius,

you`ve brightened up my night!

(After failing to towse out a miserable old git one)

This is completely un - toppable

Thanks! thanks! thanks!

If you wish to post a comment you must login.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Find out more Hide this message