"UN HOMME ET UNE FEMME"
I confess that the transphobia kerfuffle with JK Rowling largely passed me by, so I’ll admit to being a bit shaky on the facts of the story. As I understand it, JKR lampooned the fabricated terminology and imagery of menstruation rather than calling a spade a “woman” and for this she was accused of transphobia.
Let me say from the off that I have no issue with anyone getting a new willy or fanny to replace their old fanny or willy; with anyone simply wishing they had a willy or a fanny to replace the fanny or the willy they’ve got. Personally, I wish my nudger was the length and thickness of a bratwurst sausage. Nothing wrong with any of these scenarios.
But it’s the silliness of the terminology which amuses me. And I too have had my own JK Rowling moment.
While I was researching urinary incontinence on the internet (it doesn’t matter why!) I came across the NHS Advice and Guidance page on this. Not some barmpot, PC site for woke millennials, but the NHS, mind you. And, lo and behold, it talked about “if you have a penis” and “persons with a vagina”. Now call me over-simplistic if you will but wouldn’t the words “man” and “woman” fit the bill?
And it got me to thinking. Worldwide fans will be familiar with my fondness for a good parody and this seemed to offer up a treasure trove of possibilities too numerous to list. Suffice it to say that I could have started with that Percy Sledge classic, “When a Person with a Penis Loves a Person with a Vagina”; or perhaps addressed a woke re-write of Louisa May Alcott’s “Vertically Challenged People, Menstrually Transitioning”. If my French was up to it I might have a bash at that 60’s film script “Un Homme et Une Femme” with “Une personne avec un penis et Une Personne avec un Vagin”, although I suspect I may lose a little of its romance.
We’ve been doing wrong for some time now
For eons and eons before
But to call us all men and women
It just isn’t PC no more.
It seems there’s a movement of people
Whose feelings are awfully tender
Or else they’re confused by their front bits
And not sure at all of their gender.
Well, Coops might present a solution
(In truth, not mine, I confess)
I’ve blagged it from a top website
The home of our own NHS.
They recognise gender’s not simple
We all can just take our pick
Like Frosties from a Variety Pack
Despite your quim or your prick.
So let use of the terms “man” and “woman”
Be consigned to where it belongs
Expunged like the plague from all language
In books and in films and from songs.
I’ll start with this decadent bollocks
A 60’s film dragged up in France
Its fascist depiction of gender
You’ll spot at a cursory glance.
The film “A Man and a Woman”
Will no longer offend and displease
Now Coops has wielded his red pen;
The first thing the audience sees
The title emblazed on the screen
Before all the credits began,
“Une Personne avec un Penis
Et une Personne avec un Vagin”.
John Coopey
Tue 29th Sep 2020 08:08
Many thanks for your thoughts, MC and Paul.
It amuses me that for years women (they’re the ones with a front bum) have resented being considered sex objects, whilst now they want to be defined by it.
And thanks for the Likes, Stephen and Flavia.