Donations are essential to keep Write Out Loud going    

Former Tory minister attacked for citing Holocaust poem in defence of outdoor smoking

entry picture

A Tory MP who survived Labour’s general election landslide victory has been criticised after she posted a poem about the Holocaust to criticise government plans to introduce outdoor smoking bans.

Esther McVey, the MP for Tatton and a former cabinet minister, posted on X – an online platform that Write Out Loud left earlier this month - the words of Martin Niemöller’s poem 'First They Came', about inaction from within Germany against the Nazis. It includes the lines: “Then they came for the Jews. And I did not speak out.” McVey ended her tweet: “Pertinent words re Starmer’s smoking ban.”

The health secretary, Wes Streeting, replied on X: “No, I do not think the postwar confessional of Martin Niemöller about the silent complicity of the German intelligentsia and clergy in the Nazi rise to power is pertinent to a Smoking Bill that was in your manifesto and ours to tackle one of the biggest killers. Get a grip.”

McVey’s tweet was condemned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews as “repugnant”.

“The use of Martin Niemöller’s poem about the horrors of the Nazis to describe a potential smoking ban is an ill-considered and repugnant action,” it said. “We would strongly encourage the MP for Tatton to delete her tweet and apologise for this breathtakingly thoughtless comparison.”

In a cabinet reshuffle last year, McVey was appointed Minister of State without Portfolio in the Cabinet Office by Rishi Sunak, and was reportedly given the job of "leading the government's anti-woke agenda". She was dubbed the "minister for common sense".

McVey posted a statement later insisting she would not remove the original tweet. She said: “Nobody is suggesting that banning smoking outside pubs can be equated with what happened to the Jews at the hands of the Nazis. It is ridiculous for anyone to even suggest that was what I was doing.

“It is called an analogy – those who restrict freedoms start with easy targets then expand their reach. I am pretty sure everyone understands the point I was making and knows that no offence was ever intended and that no equivalence was being suggested.” She added: “I will not be bullied into removing a tweet by people who are deliberately twisting the meaning of my words and finding offence when they know none was intended.”

 

 

◄ Your chance to take the stage: Write Out Loud's poetry jam at Marsden jazz festival!

Battery Rocks: Katrina Naomi, Seren ►

Please consider supporting us

Donations from our supporters are essential to keep Write Out Loud going

Comments

Profile image

David RL Moore

Sat 31st Aug 2024 07:56

The thing that offends me most about McVey is her idiocy and ignorance.

Niemöller’s Poem is clearly not an analogy, (as McVey claimed) it's the prophectic truth of something which actually occurred in fairly recent history.

Neither is McVey's correlation of a proposed smoking ban with creeping nazi ideology and murder a fitting or relevant association that rational people might entertain.

One could be forgiven for believing an alleged former journalist/broadcaster should know what an analogy is and where one might be appropriate. But then again standards have dropped somewhat.

"Hard hitting" that's a chuckle. Denis Healey once said of Geoffrey Howe that debating with him was "like being savaged by a dead sheep" McVey puts me in mind of his words.

David RL Moore

Profile image

Greg Freeman

Fri 30th Aug 2024 21:42

Three of my journalist colleagues - all heavy smokers in their day - had/have COPD. Two have already died of it. I go to the second one's funeral next week.

Uilleam Ó Ceallaigh

Fri 30th Aug 2024 21:26

She said the poem constituted “Pertinent words re Starmer’s smoking ban”,
Pertinent: "having a clear decisive relevance to the matter in hand”.
Her quote had a clearly intended relevance to the ban (in outdoor pub gardens-intended to save lives) and in doing so, belittled the memory of the Holocaust for the sake of cheap political point-scoring.

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Fri 30th Aug 2024 16:44

A hard hitting opinion from this MP - as it was surely intended to be. More to the point...needs to be. I recall the basis for
extending the Ulez scheme across a vast swathe of Greater London as rooted in "health reasons" e.g. respiratory afflictions, for inflicting a policy that imposes so much hardship
on so many across the spectrum of "making a living".
Virtue-signalling to cover a blatant fund raising process. I've
spent my adult life among and ON the busiest streets of the
capital, YET "respiratory" illness is not something that affects
my 80 year old self. Odd, don't you think? Nanny loves to
exercise power and control!

If you wish to post a comment you must login.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Find out more Hide this message