“Men judge us by the success of our efforts. God looks at the efforts themselves” - Charlotte Brontë CONSIDER THIS I shall write in a style that may, or may not be, self explainatory. I mean, I don’t know, what it is, if anything, I will end up with, will be any good. If my effort is found to be good, I will read it in spring or May. A strong end, does not have to be interplanetary: the thing is does it add to knowledge? Will I ever acknowledge that if it is good it is as they say not self explanatory and not clear at the end? Does that make it a poor ending, the reader not having the knowledge? That can’t be explanatory and that cannot be good. It is as if to say let’s write a play with a weak end, then publicise that it is good, in the knowledge that the rest of it is a good story. Will that story, if it is to be believed be good in the end and be acknowledged as the very making of the play? Is the above self explanatory or in the end What is it that acknowledges The material is a good write or simply Nuts in May?