Blue
i like this edit better and feel the poem emerge from the inspirational earlier draft and agree with Darren Thomas' views
that's the 2nd line in Mikhail - that mean you didn't read the rest? when i see this kind of comment i sigh and want to understand what it means in relation to the poem - if it is that you didn't read because of the word god then why bother commenting at all?
I was with you till you mentioned god. mikhail x.
darren thomas
Mon 5th Nov 2012 17:16
There are always significant things happening in your poetry Marianne. Your lexicon alone is usually worth the entrance fee.
I read the lines in reverse also, to try and work out what it is about your style that's intriguing? And the constituents still sound poetic!
Give my regards to G.
If you wish to post a comment you must login.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
Laura Taylor
Thu 8th Nov 2012 12:22
Jampacked full of hugely evocative imagery - your writing is changing and flowing so fast these days, and this one seems to have more...what's the word...form?structure? It is less fluid/stream of cons whilst still holding onto the process that kicks it off. I know what I mean!!
Love it, fantastic piece. I read those first 3 verses in awe.