WILL YOU STILL NEED ME,WILL YOU STILL FEED ME?
WILL YOU STILL NEED ME, WILL YOU STILL FEED ME?
So sang Sir Paul, a late Sixties landmark song,
lyrics and score penned in seconds I’m sure and
jaunty as they come, neither revealing nor concealing
the big issues of the day, but a ballad for our time, a devotion,
a short, sweet love song, a subliminal gong on the froth and sweat of
Britpop’s arriviste best, a testament to the worth of the small, the simple,
the joys of the ordinary surely round the next corner,
an epic in the baking of teacakes and muffins,
in the making of bonfires and models in bottles.
Everyone who was an anyone who was at one
with the raw humanity of this homage to middle age
would remember its words – more readily, perhaps, than
the Lord’s Prayer, Jerusalem or much of the National Anthem.
For many, the countdown years to the average mid-to-long-stop,
announcing entry to true old age, would become clearer,
a bonus in words shelled out to all, a gift from Sir Paul,
a call to carry on doing what you always have done
and the end will be wonderfully rosy and cosy.
And to the degree that I need to explain my delay
today in reaching the end of my regular contemplation of
the way life evolves, revolves, resolves and dissolves –
all the four seasons in every day – the reason is that the song
picked out as the age, some way down the road, at which we might
credibly pitch our performance against a dozen doyen paradigms,
a rhyming sixty-four (“would you lock the door”) – which, some would say,
introduces a frivolity, a superficiality of purpose, a travesty,
the elevation of a ditty to a treatise.
“But it is and always will be a song” say a population
of fans of every age. And so it is. But wisdom may lie
with and in the words, just as it might in a parable; or may be
barely comparable with any other piece – it is what it is,
perfect, refreshing, a single brush-stroke on a canvas.
It’s my sixty-fourth today. As this morning’s light accrued with consciousness,
the song seeped in and I was gratefully reminded of the shortness
of the road ahead and the things that remained to be done
to be one of the needed, one of the fed.
raypool
Fri 29th Mar 2019 17:53
I love the exposition of your thoughts and findings Peter. Much respect due to your attitude; what I think stands out to me is the experimental nature of the song within the context of the times. I would guess it was written as an indulgence and a curio, much as "Let 'em In" was . Quite heady with nostalgia as per Penny Lane. The use of the small band instrumentation helped to set it in in stone. I can't really sense Lennon's influence here!
On my 64th I was doing a gig and played it in the band room !
It gave me pleasure that you were grateful for the time ahead, which I'm sure you will share wisely with us all.
All the best Ray