Donations are essential to keep Write Out Loud going    

VIVE LA REPUBLIQUE

entry picture

 

I’ve never considered myself a monarchist.  I buy into those arguments about unelected privilege and unearned wealth.

But I was making these points to someone the other day and they said to me, “So who would you have instead?”

“An elected President” I said.

“Like who?”

And there my certainty faded a bit.

I realised that if we’d have abolished the monarchy 40 years ago we’d have had as Head of State representing all of us

Margaret Thatcher – certainly

Tony Blair too

David Cameron – very likely, or Boris Johnson maybe.

“Ah, but it doesn’t have to be a divisive politician” I hear you thinking.

So, David Beckham perhaps, or Cilla Black?

It’s a good question, isn’t it?

◄ THE DYSON AIRBLADE

OLD SEPP (PART 2) ►

Comments

Profile image

John Coopey

Tue 27th Oct 2015 20:20

Many thanks for your thoughts, MC.
"Suiting their situation and public popularity" made me think of Jeremy Corbyn's refusal to sing the national anthem. Whilst I might admire his principles it demonstrates to me the man's naivety. He surely recognises that he needs 11m votes at the next election. He surely recognises too that with the vast majority of the electorate the Queen is popular. It will come back to haunt him.
Set aside his principles - it was a tactical schoolboy howler.

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Tue 27th Oct 2015 17:12

After the experience of the Lord Protector Cromwell -
perhaps upset by the killjoys who held sway under his
tenure, the English (well, it was certainly them in the
ascendancy) decided enough was enough of the brush
with republicanism and decided that things could now
get better, with a harsh lesson against "absolute power"
inflicted and still in reserve as a reminder. Whatever the
objections to royalty, sometimes individually, sometimes
as an institution, often one served to support and save
the other - with the collective wealth of experience -
e.g. our present monarch - and huge source of wisdom
and experience that our "here today/gone tomorrow"
politicians can draw upon when in government.
We can remind ourselves that they are usually very
glad of the opportunity and the ability to claim they
have consulted "Her Majesty" when it suits their
situation and public popularity.
There are many who have huge influence but are not
elected, just as there are many who have huge wealth
that might fall outside the term "earned". Our history
is littered with them. It is how they use either that
matters most.
Lord (or Lady) Protector today...anyone?

If you wish to post a comment you must login.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Find out more Hide this message