part of the sequence of the equation for scratching my nose...
Like every sequence defined by linear recurrence, the Fibonacci numbers have a closed-form solution. It has become known as Binet's formula, even though it was already known by Abraham de Moivre:
- where is the golden ratio
- (sequence A001622 in OEIS)
(note, that , as can be seen from the defining equation above).
The Fibonacci recursion
is similar to the defining equation of the golden ratio in the form
which is also known as the generating polynomial of the recursion.
[edit] Proof by induction
Any root of the equation above satisfies and multiplying by shows:
By definition is a root of the equation, and the other root is Therefore:
and
Both and are geometric series (for n = 1, 2, 3, ...) that satisfy the Fibonacci recursion. The first series grows exponentially; the second exponentially tends to zero, with alternating signs. Because the Fibonacci recursion is linear, any linear combination of these two series will also satisfy the recursion. These linear combinations form a two-dimensional linear vector space; the original Fibonacci sequence can be found in this space.
Linear combinations of series and , with coefficients a and b, can be defined by
- for any real
All thus-defined series satisfy the Fibonacci recursion
Requiring that Fa,b(0) = 0 and Fa,b(1) = 1 yields and , resulting in the formula of Binet we started with. It has been shown that this formula satisfies the Fibonacci recursion. Furthermore, an explicit check can be made:
and
establishing the base cases of the induction, proving that
- for all
Therefore, for any two starting values, a combination a,b can be found such that the function is the exact closed formula for the series.
[edit] Computation by rounding
Since for all , the number F(n) is the closest integer to Therefore it can be found by rounding, or in terms of the floor function:
[edit] Limit of consecutive quotients
Johannes Kepler observed that the ratio of consecutive Fibonacci numbers converges. He wrote that "as 5 is to 8 so is 8 to 13, practically, and as 8 is to 13, so is 13 to 21 almost”, and concluded that the limit approaches the golden ratio .[10]
This convergence does not depend on the starting values chosen, excluding 0, 0. For example, the initial values 19 and 31 generate the sequence 19, 31, 50, 81, 131, 212, 343, 555 ... etc. The ratio of consecutive terms in this sequence shows the same convergence towards the golden ratio.
[edit] Proof
In brief, Fibonacci numbers are approximately exponential ��" where the constant depends on starting values ��" as the remaining term in the exact formula for the Fibonacci numbers becomes exponentially close to zero as n grows. Taking the ratio yields
More formally, it must always follow from the explicit formula that for any real
kealan coady
Fri 16th Oct 2009 00:36
this poem reminds me of acid