Science is Divided
The oceans rise and temperatures rocket,
But we have the answer in our pocket.
A glossy document, signed and dated –
Oh, come on, you should be elated –
In which we promise to slightly reduce
The poisonous discharges we let loose.
Not straight away, of course, you understand;
There are more pressing urgencies at hand.
Nearby, a man sinks down beneath the waves;
His birthplace is a mass of watery graves.
He pleads for help to the world’s good and great,
Knowing full well that it is much too late:
‘Didn’t you see the signs of global heat;
Or the melting of the icy Polar sheet?
And what of that meeting you presided?’
‘That? Oh, you know, science is divided.’
Stephen Gospage
Fri 24th Nov 2023 10:54
Thank you, Manish, John GE, Tim and John C for your comments and support, and to Hèlène, Hugh, K Lynn and Carlton for liking. It's sad that the old 'science is divided' or 'there's not enough evidence' refrains are still being used by those who wish to do nothing.
Exactly the same fraudulent arguments were used by industries to deny man-made ozone depletion, lead in petrol, or indeed the effects of smoking on health.
Thanks for your comment, M.C. The Montreal Protocol of 1987 (a shining example of international cooperation, supported by the likes of Ronald Reagan and Mrs Thatcher) has enabled mankind to reverse the potentially devastating effects of ozone depletion.