Oxford professor Hill takes Carol Ann Duffy to task
Oxford’s professor of poetry, Sir Geoffrey Hill, has rapped Carol Ann Duffy, the poet laureate, over the knuckles over her linking of modern poetry with texting. In a lecture at Oxford entitled Poetry, Policing and Public Order, Hill, who was knighted in last month’s New Year honours, and is known for the “difficulty” of his own poetry, said: “When the laureate speaks of the tremendous potential for a vital new poetry to be drawn from the practice of texting she is policing her patch. And when I beg her with all due respect to her high office to consider that she may be wrong, I am policing mine.”
Hill went on to criticise the language of one of Duffy’s early poems that was quoted in an article in the Guardian, saying: “For the common good she is willing to have quoted by the Guardian interviewer several lines from a poem by herself that could be easily be mistaken for a first effort by one of the young people she wishes to encourage.
“This is democratic English pared to its barest bean and I would not myself have the moral courage to write so. My simultaneous incompatible response is this is not democratic English but cast-off bits of oligarchical commodity English such as is employed by writers for Mills & Boon and by celebrity critics appearing on A Good Read or the Andrew Marr show.”
After a grammar school education in Bromsgrove, Hill studied English at Keble College, Oxford before embarking on an academic career. Duffy was born in the Gorbals in Glasgow, in a “bookless house”, and is now professor of contemporary poetry at Manchester Metropolitan University.
Duffy has not responded to the criticism so far. Of course, she may do so in a poem.
Adele Ward
Wed 8th Feb 2012 12:29
I have noticed that reviewers often try to pick out any poems in a good collection that aren't as 'heavyweight' as the others. I feel that some slight poems do deserve their place in a collection. They often have an important reason for being there - perhaps they chime with other themes and they also add the variety a full collection needs so long as there are only one or two. They are often the poems people name as being their favourites when they read a collection - those little poems that somehow really stay in your mind and say something to you.