Donations are essential to keep Write Out Loud going    

Should five-year-olds be made to learn poems by heart?

entry picture

Poet Simon Armitage has expressed his deep reservations about the plan by the education secretary, Michael Gove, to ensure five-year-old pupils learn to recite poems by heart. In an article on the Guardian’s website Armitage said he was “nervous about the noises currently being made by the Department for Education about returning to ‘traditional values’ in schools – values which would see children as young as five being expected to learn and recite poetry ‘by heart’.”

He added: “My concerns are mainly about labelling poetry as something solid, traditional and worthy, something belonging to the establishment, a yardstick against which most people won't measure up. I'm also worried that by poetry, what the government might really mean is ‘poetry’, or POETRY – that is, grist for the spoken English competition, in which students at my school were expected to stand on a stage and chew their way through The Lady of Shalott in a feigned and foreign RP accent. If those are the values being pursued, and if in Michael Gove's master plan English literature is actually a byword for Englishness, or learning ‘by heart’ might actually mean learning by rote, then I'd prefer poetry to have no part in it.”

Armitage went on: “If, on the other hand, children are allowed to find the poems that fit their voices or appeal to their imaginations and their cultural inclinations, then I'm on board. It's a well-established fact that poems learned at an early stage in the form of nursery rhymes stay with us for life, and that people suffering with Alzheimer's and other forms of memory loss, who struggle in later life to remember their address or the names of their children, can often recite nursery rhymes without any difficulty. The brain is always keen to seize on pattern and structure, and the growing brain seems to instil poetry at its core.”

Gove is said to be determined to make the teaching of English at primary school "far more rigorous" than it is at present, with the study of poetry becoming an important part of the subject at primary school level. According to reports, from Year 1, at the age of five, children will be read poems by their teacher as well as starting to learn simple poems by heart and practise recitals. The programme of study for Year 2 will state that pupils should continue "to build up a repertoire of poems learnt by heart and recite some of these, with appropriate intonation to make the meaning clear".

But one primary headteacher queried whether there was anything new in the proposals regarding poetry. She told Write out Loud: “Teachers have never stopped reading children poems. Pupils already learn and recite them, for example at assemblies. The first time I heard the term ‘performance poetry’ was via the national curriculum. Poetry has been part of the national curriculum ever since it was introduced.”

 

◄ Saving the Earth, one poem at a time

Slam champion Ben Mellor's top performance tips ►

Please consider supporting us

Donations from our supporters are essential to keep Write Out Loud going

Comments

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Sun 17th Jun 2012 15:15

J.C. - you'll excuse me if I don't read too much into your observations. They just don't add up! Or is it me?
Personally...
I'm all for lathering the little beasts until they have "The Ancient Mariner" off word-perfect and can discuss its meaning!!!

Profile image

Cynthia Buell Thomas

Sat 16th Jun 2012 14:07

In my teaching experience, children of all ages loved to do poetry 'classes'. They enjoyed learning about standard 'forms', reading poems appropriate to their age group and interests, either personally or aloud to a group, and then, especially writing their own ideas. It took remarkably little encouragement to set their creative fires alight. I still have 'samples' of their work that please me today to reread. Poetry should be part of the English curriculum, even for five-year-old's. But, seriously, so much depends on the teacher's personal enthusiasm, accurate knowledge and skills in motivation. Most teachers would benefit from some official 'poetry-teaching' seminars. Many of our current educators were deprived of poetry exposure in a vital, inclusive way.

I think the 'common' Nursery Rhymes still used today are basically a travesty of 'literature', never ever intended for children's consumption. Put them back into the historical, satirical, political arena where they might have been originally 'clever' to the sniggering adult populace.

Profile image

Isobel

Fri 15th Jun 2012 19:08

I think this is a classic case of successive governments feeling like they should be saying something about education, or looking like they have something new to say. It brings to mind a lot of what Kenneth Steven said to me in the interview we did together.

If we were to look for positives in it all, at least it is putting poetry on the podium... If there is a primary school in England that isn't already giving poetry its fair slot, perhaps they'd have to think about it, for a moment, until it's all change again...

Profile image

John Coopey

Fri 15th Jun 2012 17:44

Encourage? No! Suggest? Yes!
There's far too much encouragement of kids to read and write and add up and subtract. They should be allowed to decide for themselves.

Profile image

John F Keane

Fri 15th Jun 2012 08:55

Imposing middle class culture discriminates against the working class. However,depriving children of middle class culture is disadvantaging them. Damned if you do...

Profile image

Ann Foxglove

Thu 14th Jun 2012 17:57

Here here Isobel. I agree with all you say (on this occasion:)

Profile image

Isobel

Thu 14th Jun 2012 15:15

Poetry is definitely already present in the school that I work in and children are encouraged to get up and have a go. That poetry is pitched at a level that primary children can enjoy though - with lots of repetition and rhyme. It's a great way of improving their confidence. We get the older kids to write stuff and perform to the younger kids - it's amazing how some shy kids can blossom. No-one should ever be forced to do something publicly if they don't want to though - not in primary school.

Traditional nursery rhymes are the best early introduction to poetry. It is surprising how many kids don't know the basic nursery rhymes we used to know before attending school though...

Profile image

Julian (Admin)

Wed 13th Jun 2012 17:21

'Made', no. Encouraged? Definitely.

Profile image

M.C. Newberry

Wed 13th Jun 2012 16:46

Humpty-Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty-Dumpty had a great fall...
Kids love nonsense and rhythm and anything that catches their fancy. Introducing them to the treasure chest of verse at an early age can open the doors of enjoyment for years to come. It is not about indoctrination. You can leada horse to water...try getting a young child to react to something that isn't fun or worth his/her time. R.L. Stevenson knew this and his verse for children is still widely admired. There is nothing wrong in learning by rote; on the contrary, it teaches not only the poem but also discipline - and kids need to be led as well as needing an example to follow.

If you wish to post a comment you must login.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Find out more Hide this message